Friday, April 20, 2007

In and around...


I will admit it, i have been a wee little bit of a slacker here on the old blog updates.. As I sit on the back porch smoking a stogie, watching the moon and Venus a beautiful day and evening.. I have alot going in in my life... Like everyone else.. So a little recap for you all to bring you up to speed in the life of Nutz!
Crackerz is pregnant and due here real soon. The second of June is the forecasted day! We shall see how accurate the docs are.
I am taking the last real class in my masters program before I begin my final project. A 10yr masters. Fun... Not I am ready to get that sucker over with.
In anticipation of the arrival of our daughter, I have been doing lots of little things around the house. The babies room, furniture and making space for the plethora of clothes that are coming in. This weekend i will move my last little bastion of closet space to the attic.
I have also changed jobs. I am now working for the government again. I do some interesting things that i don't think i should post here. Lets just say I am flying again... sort of!
Plus all the other things to make a house run, and take care of my beautiful wife crackerz. A Demanding and thankless job. Lets see if she reads this..
I am baching it this weekend as Crackerz is down in Dixie for the second of three baby showers. I have alot on my to do list and this weekend is supposed to be beautiful. It has been a while since the weather has been nice so i am taking advantage of the time and the quiet bed. I love ya babe however i do like full reign of the sheets and getting my way this weekend.. Have fun in the south land, i need to finish my stogie!
Nutz


Plus I have been doing some pole dancing!

More Bay Oaks legal Wrangling

Supreme Court to decide referendum issue over undeveloped land

By MATTHEW JONES, The Virginian-Pilot
© April 20, 2007


RICHMOND - The fate of 21 acres of undeveloped East Ocean View land hung in the balance Thursday, when the state's highest court heard a case brought by a group that hopes to save it.

At issue was a petition asking that voters be allowed to decide whether the land is redeveloped.

The oral arguments before the Supreme Court of Virginia were technical, focusing on whether a single petition was enough to address multiple ordinances approved by the Norfolk City Council.

The court's decision is expected within the next two months.

Thursday's hearing stemmed from a battle that began in June 2005, when the Bay Oaks Park Committee, which had been fighting for years to preserve the land, asked that the entire 21 acres be made into a public park. The property is between 3rd Bay and 7th Bay streets, across Ocean View Avenue from the Chesapeake Bay.

One month later, the City Council unanimously voted to rezone much of the land to allow for the development of 85 houses and an eight-acre park.

The following month, the group presented the c ouncil with a petition demanding that residents be allowed to vote on whether to rescind the rezoning. The city argued that the petition's wording was unclear, and that a referendum was an inappropriate way to make zoning decisions.

The Norfolk Redevelopment and Housing Authority, a state-chartered agency, owns most of the rezoned property. But there are nearly a dozen private property owners whose land was also affected.


The committee's attorney, Andrew M. Sacks, argued that the group acted in good faith, and that the petition's signers were told this was merely the first stage of several it would take to have the land designated as a park.

The city took the matter to Norfolk Circuit Court in February 2006, and a Richmond judge brought in for the hearing declared the petition invalid, saying the committee should have gathered signatures on four petitions to match the council's four ordinances.

Sacks appealed to the state Supreme Court, maintaining that one petition was sufficient. On Thursday, he reiterated this claim, citing parts of the Norfolk city code as support.

Arguing for the city and housing authority, Conrad M. Shumadine - who also represents The Virginian-Pilot - said the Norfolk Circuit Court was correct in deciding that one petition was inadequate to put the issue on the ballot.

Furthermore, he said, the four ordinances were legally unrelated yet included together, making the potential for confusion high.

In his rebuttal, Sacks argued that the ordinances are related because they're the first legal steps necessary to begin converting the land to open space. To follow the city's logic that the ordinances need to be handled separately, he said, "would not only have a chilling effect" on future petitions, but would effectively prevent any future challenge by voters.

For if a City Council were intent on passing an issue, he said, it could effectively make its decision petition-proof by splitting it into multiple parts.

Monday, April 16, 2007

The pros and cons of an armed society!

From the VCDL...

As most of you know VCDL has been pushing hard to change Virginia law to
allow college and university students with concealed handgun permits to
be able to carry a gun on campus for self-defense.

Last year Delegate Todd Gilbert put in such a bill for us and so did
Delegate Mark Cole this year.

We could not get the bills out of subcommittee.

We warned the General Assembly that violent crime can, and does, happen
on campuses across the Commonwealth.

But the university and college lobbyists swore that crime was not an
issue and that the schools did not want students and visitors to be able
to defend themselves with a gun or other weapon. They argued that the
schools had little boxes with lights that had a button someone could
press if they needed the police.

The General Assembly turned a deaf ear to allowing college and
university students to be able to protect themselves and here we are
today :-(

While it is NOT illegal for a college or university student with a CHP
to carry in Virginia, they could get expelled (or fired if a teacher).
And that is a severe enough financial penalty that students don't want
to take the chance. Who can blame them?

But, I'll bet a few are reconsidering their position now. Expelled by 1
or carried by 6?

VCDL will make it a high priority again next year to get a bill
introduced that will let students and faculty carry.

I don't want to hear from universities and colleges any more about crime
not happening on campuses, or the police will save you if there is a
problem, or that we need more gun control on campuses.

ENOUGH OF ELITIST BALONEY FROM COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES!

If just ONE of those victims had been armed, this most probably would
have turned out very differently:

Nutzez 2 cents...
Think about the laws that lawmakers create and how those laws affect
you! I would rather be shot in the chest then in the back..

Saturday, April 07, 2007

Saturday AM

Well it is Saturday am here in coastal VA. I was awakened by our American flag just flapping away. also to my surprise, snow flurries. Considering it was 80 degrees here on Wednesday, I dont think we will be seeing any snow men until possibly next January. The Chesapeake bay bridge tunnel weather doo hickey is calling winds and gusts around 40kts. Cool I like crappy weather!

Wednesday, April 04, 2007

Thank you

Thank you to all who contributed to the Doug Sloan fund during taco night. A nice check was just sent to Petosky Michigan for his orphans.

You and your debit/credit card

JUST LAST MONTH, 1,000 Stop & Shop customers had their credit and debit card information stolen after thieves replaced store card-reading devices with ones that captured account data. It's the latest incident in a string of high-profile credit- and debit-card data breaches that have affected companies as varied as T.J. Maxx and Marshalls, Citibank, and payment processor CardSystems.

The lucky victims — if such a thing can be said — are those who got their credit-card data stolen, says Scott Bilker, founder of DebtSmart.com. Under the Fair Credit Reporting Act, your credit-card issuer can't hold you responsible for any of those unauthorized charges. "Usually, they give you a new card, a new account number, and that's that," he explains.

But consumers whose debit-card data gets lifted are subject to a different set of rules and regulations — ones that may well leave you unprotected. "You're in a fundamentally weak position angling to get the grocery money put back in your checking account," says Jean Ann Fox, director of consumer protection for the Consumer Federation of America. Best-case scenario, you're out of cash until the bank investigates your claim. And there's a very real chance you could lose some — or all — of that money for good.

Debit transactions are regulated under the Electronic Funds Transfer Act. Under these rules, just how much you'll be able to recover depends on how quickly you discover the problem. If you notify your bank within two business days of learning about an unauthorized transaction, your liability is $50, maximum. Between two and 60 days, your liability is $500; after that, it's unlimited.

Banks build on these rules with their own policies. These so-called "zero liability" policies claim to free the consumer from fees and losses should unauthorized purchases be made to your debit account. In most cases, the banks promise to fully reimburse you. "But there's no law that says they have to," says Bilker. "It's all on their terms and their interpretations." Fact is, if the theft occurred for a reason that the bank deems your own fault, you're likely out of luck.

Even if you are eligible for reimbursement, don't expect to get your missing cash back quickly, says Fox. Some banks issue temporary credits, but it's a rare concession. In most cases, before you can be reimbursed, your bank must assess the charges to determine the extent of your liability. That investigation can take as long as a week.

So when isn't a bank likely to honor some or even all of your claims? When you fall into any of the following four loopholes:

If the PIN was lifted along with your account number good luck getting reimbursed, says Fox. With the exception of Bank of America, Chase, and Wells Fargo, most major banks won't cover all unauthorized charges or withdrawals completed with a PIN. Signed purchases, on the other hand, are covered because they are processed through trusted credit-card networks.

So sign away whenever possible. While it takes an extra step, it offers an extra layer of protection. For other perks to signing, click here.

If your bank thinks you're to blame for your account number getting stolen, you can be held liable for losses in that account. MasterCard, for example, allows banks issuing its cards to assign liability when a consumer has not "exercised reasonable care in safeguarding the card," according to the details of its liability policy.

Good luck figuring out what that means. "The language is a little bit open-ended," says Joanne Trout, vice president of worldwide communications. "At the end of the day, it's the bank's call." Carelessness, she says, could mean anything from letting your college kid borrow the card to shopping through an unsecured web site.

"If someone cleans out your account, it's inevitable: checks are going to bounce," warns Bilker. The resulting overdraft fees won't necessarily be reimbursed.

Also, be aware that if your account is already overdrawn or in otherwise poor standing when the theft occurs, that may be another reason for the bank not to reimburse you. The idea is that you already weren't monitoring your account diligently.

Major banks require you to catch the unauthorized transaction within 60 days of receiving your monthly statement to qualify for the zero liability policy. Spot it later than that and you'll need to cite extenuating circumstances — say, a hospital stay or a long trip abroad — to be reimbursed.

Tuesday, April 03, 2007

Go Gators!



The gators do it again!

Nutz, what happened to the Big 10? :-)

Monday, April 02, 2007

A sunday afternoon

This past Sunday, we took Larry to the airport to leave for his short deployment. It makes the goodbyes so much easier when you have people with you.

Here are a few pictures from our afternoon.




  1. Chris and Larry
  2. Chris and Anne (yes, Chris had a nice BIG margarita)
  3. The girls lounging on the couch watching Flicka.

Days Hours and Minutes to the end of the Myan Calendar

" name="timezone"/>

Democrat = Tax Cheat

المسلحة الكافر = Armed Infidel

Change has come to Washington D.C.
Rangel
Daschel
Geithner

Our 2009 Tax return to the US Govt = I.O.U.
Thank you California for setting the stage.

Thanks for voting America!